The acting is superb.
Out on video this week is Oliver Stone's Savages, and from Blake Lively to Salma Hayek, from Aaron Taylor-Johnson and John Travolta, to Taylor Kitsch and Demian Birchir, to Benecio Del Toro (and I will be greatly surprised if Mr. Del Toro is not nominated for his performance) the performances are at the peak of perfection. Savages examines two pot growers Ben (Taylor-Johnson) and Chon (Kitsch) who grow "the best pot in the world" and the process of rival Mexican cartel led by Elena (Hayek) and Lado (Del Toro) taking their business over. While you have read a number of deconstructions I have done on various works of art, Savages stands as Mr. Stone's own deconstruction on both socialism and capitalism and the inherent wrongs within each, and for this reason it's worth considering because it's a pure vehicle of politics against both major economic models dominating the country and, while I disagree with his assessment, he does an admirable job of using visuals to communicate political concepts to his audience.
deconstructing and not employing another perspective? Word play.
Whore Houses & Soccer Stars: The Hurt Locker for more). Chon first describes Elena's gang cutting the heads off several people as "savage," then Lado describes Chon's, Ben's and O's threesome as "savage" and finally, O describes their life in the remote island at the end as being beautifully savage. So what does the word "savage" mean and to what does the title Savages refer? Who are the savages and what makes a person a savage? This is one branch of deconstruction and Stone does it to show how, regardless of what the capitalists think of the socialists, and the socialists think of the capitalists, both sides are guilty of crimes; how does he encode this message for us?
Sex and drugs.
Socialists, of course, would say the cartel doesn't, but the monopolizing and taking over everything for themselves (the way a socialist government owns everything) is the characteristic linking the violent group to socialism as well as the violence used to enforce the take over (Marxism, socialism and communism have tremendous violence in their history). Further, socialism tends to breed paranoia within the government, and the ruthless torturing of Alex (Demian Birchir, A Better Life) is commonly associated with the show-trials of Stalin (The Dark Knight Rises employs show trials as well invoking the past of the French Revolution; for more on show-trials and power, you might be interested in Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish; it's not without problems, but it is interesting). Lastly, Elena's role as a mother fits in with the socialist mask because a socialist government presents itself as a parent to its people even though, as in the film, it is an unwanted parent (the dead children of Elena, as in The House At the End of the Street, symbolizes the countries in which socialism had taken root and lived briefly, but then died).
O plays an imperative role in the film and to fully understand her, we should start with her name. As stated, "O" stands for Ophelia, the love of William Shakespeare's Hamlet who drowns herself (please see image below; please recall that a character named "O" appears also in Men In Black III, played by Emma Thompson, and another Shakespeare play, MacBeth, is quoted in The Raven). Great works of art invoke other great works of art, and when so doing, the artists desire to draw our attention to that work of art in order to expand commentary on the events being presented. In Hamlet, the kingdom is taken over when the king sleeps and poison is poured into his ear by the king's brother who then takes the crown for himself. For capitalists, we can easily see in this an image of Obama's socialist revolution (since both are economic models, capitalism and socialism could be said to be "brothers") taking over America when we were asleep and the poison poured into our ears was "hope" and "change" leading to the ruin we have now.
Stone's dramatizing of O's character is beneficial for another reason: O both validates and re-enforces the traditional symbolism of a young woman being symbolic of America while an older woman of mature years symbolizes the "motherland." O has both a distant relationship with her mother (consider when she goes to her mom's house and leaves her a note about going to Europe, not very personal, is it?) and a emotionally personal one (she writes her mom a sincere, moving note when she's in captivity); we can take this relationship to be O's mom symbolizing America's history, the distant relationship is the distant past with which she hasn't kept in touch, or "studied history" (and the mom's numerous marriages being different phases the country has gone through); the seemingly small detail of O telling her mom she's going to Europe literally means shes "going European," a foreshadowing technique of her captivity because socialism is more prevalent in European countries than elsewhere. Why does O pour out so much emotion in the letter she writes her mom, once captured?
Like so many of the films in the past year, Savages also makes a commentary on whether art is better off under socialism or capitalism, in a very sly way. When Chon and Ben have decided to leave the country for awhile, there is a shot of them in their house and two posters on either side, one The Mummy, with Boris Karloff, and the other The Phantom of the Opera. Like Total Recall which also invokes The Phantom Of the Opera (when they travel to the abandoned New York City and there is a banner on a bus for the story and I believe Expendables 2 also used the same device to site the story; please see Recall/Rekall: Memories Of Dreams & Total Recall) so Savages wants us to consider how money is used in the creation of art. I have not analyzed The Phantom Of the Opera, however, I have examined The Mummy, and since it is a film about the Great Depression and resurrection ( like James Bond's hobby in Skyfall) we can take a guess as to why Stone would include it in his film. The problem is, we don't know what Stone's interpretation of the two films is (whether he likes them, considers them masterpieces or low-budget affairs) so, again, the films are ambiguous but we can comment upon them since they have been included, yet we won't be able to make a stable point about them (please see The Curse and the Mummy for my analysis on this anti-socialist film of the Great Depression).
Attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, and Americans are literally deciding what we are going to believe in what happened and who knew what, when. Both sides of the political culture today engage in destabilizing political discourse by making themselves unreliable narrators in the constant stream of lies we are fed by Washington, so having a unreliable narrator and a story of which we are not quite sure, accurately reflects the state of the union today, which is what great art is supposed to achieve.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner
Out on video this week is Oliver Stone's Savages, and from Blake Lively to Salma Hayek, from Aaron Taylor-Johnson and John Travolta, to Taylor Kitsch and Demian Birchir, to Benecio Del Toro (and I will be greatly surprised if Mr. Del Toro is not nominated for his performance) the performances are at the peak of perfection. Savages examines two pot growers Ben (Taylor-Johnson) and Chon (Kitsch) who grow "the best pot in the world" and the process of rival Mexican cartel led by Elena (Hayek) and Lado (Del Toro) taking their business over. While you have read a number of deconstructions I have done on various works of art, Savages stands as Mr. Stone's own deconstruction on both socialism and capitalism and the inherent wrongs within each, and for this reason it's worth considering because it's a pure vehicle of politics against both major economic models dominating the country and, while I disagree with his assessment, he does an admirable job of using visuals to communicate political concepts to his audience.
deconstructing and not employing another perspective? Word play.
Whore Houses & Soccer Stars: The Hurt Locker for more). Chon first describes Elena's gang cutting the heads off several people as "savage," then Lado describes Chon's, Ben's and O's threesome as "savage" and finally, O describes their life in the remote island at the end as being beautifully savage. So what does the word "savage" mean and to what does the title Savages refer? Who are the savages and what makes a person a savage? This is one branch of deconstruction and Stone does it to show how, regardless of what the capitalists think of the socialists, and the socialists think of the capitalists, both sides are guilty of crimes; how does he encode this message for us?
Sex and drugs.
Socialists, of course, would say the cartel doesn't, but the monopolizing and taking over everything for themselves (the way a socialist government owns everything) is the characteristic linking the violent group to socialism as well as the violence used to enforce the take over (Marxism, socialism and communism have tremendous violence in their history). Further, socialism tends to breed paranoia within the government, and the ruthless torturing of Alex (Demian Birchir, A Better Life) is commonly associated with the show-trials of Stalin (The Dark Knight Rises employs show trials as well invoking the past of the French Revolution; for more on show-trials and power, you might be interested in Michel Foucault's Discipline and Punish; it's not without problems, but it is interesting). Lastly, Elena's role as a mother fits in with the socialist mask because a socialist government presents itself as a parent to its people even though, as in the film, it is an unwanted parent (the dead children of Elena, as in The House At the End of the Street, symbolizes the countries in which socialism had taken root and lived briefly, but then died).
By far, the strongest arguments to be made that we can see Elena's group as symbolizing socialism comes in the way O is treated while in captivity. She has to ask for everything and she gets no variety, typical of a centrally planned government that distributes everything and decides what gets made and what doesn't. Stone wants to force this issue to the audience in as strong of terms as possible, and he achieves this with the image above, when O, a pot addict, asks to have some and Lado takes a hit for himself, then gives O her hit by exhaling off her; like people under a socialist government, O won't get anything except "through" the government like the drug first going "through" Lado (likewise, Lado gives O a steak, but he cuts up every single bite and makes her eat it off the fork, another way Stone shows what happens to those who look to the government to provide instead of providing for themselves). Secondly, after O is high and unconscious, Lado "screws her" and records it on his phone, which is how most capitalists see a socialist government treating its people: even if the government gives you what you want, you're going to get screwed for it (like with Obamacare; we've seen another film where drugs have been employed by a socialist state, Dredd; please see 96% Unemployment: Dredd & the Socialist State). What does this scene say about the capitalists, though? O is obviously spoiled and a drug addict. In Savages, drug addiction symbolizes Americans' addiction to material goods and luxury, whereas in Dredd, the people are dependent upon Mama (Lena Heady) for everything. When Ben and Chon discuss how to get O back and how long it will take them, Chon says that O can't survive being a hostage for a couple of days and it's because she's "soft" and "pampered" (O tells them she's going to make a final "pilgrimage" to the mall; whereas a pilgrimage used to be about going to a sacred place to become spiritually healed and rejuvenated, O going to the mall means it's the luxury life of material goods which has replaced the spiritual element in a consumer-oriented world which capitalism has created. Just as drugs are an artificial means of producing pleasure so materialism is a form of drug addiction because it provides pleasure to the consumer, according to Stone. |
John Everett Millais, Ophelia, 1852, the Tate Gallery, London. Where else have we recently seen this image? Melancholia with Kirsten Dunst (please see Dance Of Death: Art n Melancholia for more). There are lots of ways to portray Ophelia, but both films turn to the act of Ophelia drowning herself. In Savages, we can understand O drowning herself in pleasure (drugs and material goods) and this leads us to answer the question proposition by O at the opening monologue: O says that, just because I am narrating this film doesn't mean I am alive at the end of it (another example of Stone's deconstruction, because the film is not only exhibiting self-awareness that it is a film--breaking down the viewer's willingness to suspend disbelief that they are watching a film and not some reality through vicarious means--but also that we may or may not have a reliable narrator who we can trust to deliver us a truthful message) so, when we see her buying fish at the native market in the end of the story, is O alive? given the word play and utilizing of masks in the film, we have to consider that, although she's physically alive, is she spiritually/metaphysically alive? As she, like Ophelia pictured above, drowned herself in sex and an irresponsible life or has something awakened inside her to take the place of the sex, drugs and materialism? It's debatable, or ambiguous, because there is nothing definite by which to answer the question, which is another characteristic of deconstruction. |
There are several important elements which take place in this scene. First, Elena has invited O to have dinner with her at her table instead of in O's prison eating pizza or steak fed to her by Lado, demonstrating how a socialist government always gives itself the best and only makes a show of being generous to its citizens when it wants something (in this case, Elena's daughter doesn't want to see her and Elena is lonely so she invites O to eat with her; Elena also has kept the best part for herself, not offering better food/shelter to O and this is typical of socialist party leaders who indulge themselves while making the citizens suffer; please consider, for example, George Orwell's Animal Farm). Elena also can't believe how dumb O is and asks if all Americans are like that; why does this happen? Socialists build their philosophy upon everyone (except themselves) being stupid (and I mean stupid) and thereby incapable of making any good decisions for themselves so the government has to decide everything for them. When Elena's and O's conversation turns to Chon and Ben, and the threesome relationship they have, Elena informs O that Ben and Chon are only willing to share her because "they love each other more" than they love her. What does this mean? Capitalists love other business owners more than the country (O as symbolic of America) and what they do they do for themselves, not because they are patriots, but to protect their interests. O's faith that Chon and Ben will save her reflects America's faith that the upper-class, the 1%, will save the country from a future of socialism. |
Attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, and Americans are literally deciding what we are going to believe in what happened and who knew what, when. Both sides of the political culture today engage in destabilizing political discourse by making themselves unreliable narrators in the constant stream of lies we are fed by Washington, so having a unreliable narrator and a story of which we are not quite sure, accurately reflects the state of the union today, which is what great art is supposed to achieve.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner
0 comments:
Post a Comment