Let's face it: money matters.
No one expected this huge haul for a sequel, and while some critics have placed the success at Liam Neeson's door, the sequel to Taken has raked in twice what the original did and has set an opening record for an action film during the September-October cinema season; we have to ask why? Given the film has received only a 19% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and audiences have graded the film at an average of a B+ (I would give it a B), then what was driving people to see this sequel? Would the film done as well if there had not been the Libyan attacks on the US Consulate and worldwide Islamic protests against America? We can only speculate, but given the inconsistencies between the film's critical reception and how much money it's pulled in, world events are certainly re-coloring the message of the film in a context (probably) never intended.
Which brings us to a genuine problem.
If people were going to see Taken 2 as a result of world wide Muslim anti-America protests, can we interpret the film within this context, or do we have to ignore what has happened in the world (which the film makers obviously could not have guessed would happen) and take the film at face value? It is my experience that the best art is always prophetic, that is, artists (in this case, film makers) are able to articulate internal conflicts and tensions within culture and make an educated guess on where that would lead, and in the case of Taken 2, the guess was right on; in other words, while the film makers could not have known precisely "how," "what," "when" and "where," they knew the "why" and encoded that into the film; catharsis, especially after real-world tragic events, will always be a purpose of art, and I believe the public trauma of the death of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, and his being sodomized, as well as the deaths of those American military personnel protecting him and the US Consulate, the attacks on the Consulate on the anniversary of 9/11, then being betrayed by our President and Secretary of State who apologized for us, is what drove so many out to see this film and re-order a chaotic world in terms we are familiar with; did the film accomplish this?
Let's begin with an old, American cinematic tradition involving the law of the Constitution and the actual practice of Americans today: the separation of the father and mother of the future of the country. In other words, film makers have usually employed the status of separation/divorce between spouses to illustrate how the country--the motherland, symbolized by a woman of mature age--to be separated from the law of the Constitution--the founding fathers as symbolized by a male of mature age--and usually a hard worker but misunderstood by his estranged family, but he usually proves himself still the hero in the end; the re-unification of the husband and wife means the stabilization of the American identity between its past and present, equalizing a hopeful future for the country (this was especially popular in John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara films, such as Big Jake and McClintock). This same formula structures the situation between Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) and Lenore/Lenny (Famke Janssen) with their daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) and the formula hasn't changed.
I will be discussing this "generation gap" again in Expendables 2: whereas Expendables 2 sees the younger generation as not having the heart to continue America as a superpower, Taken 2 demonstrates Kim can do it, she just needs the "drive" characteristic of previous generations. She has failed her driving test twice, and Mills is trying to help her so she can pass; when they drive together in the start, he warns her about going too fast and being careful not to hit other cars; when they are trying to escape with their lives in Istanbul, he has to tell her "Faster! Go through it!" and wreck the car or anything necessary to save their lives. There is a difference, in other words, when she let's her emotions "drive her" (when she's upset that dad found her with her boyfriend) and the "drive" she needs to save herself (the future of America), her father (the founding father) and her mother (the motherland), and the film employed this technique quite well.
In conclusion, we have to ask if elements of the film--even just the basic premise--was a primary draw for American audiences given recent world events because it had such an unexpected big opening weekend; I think it did (nothing against Liam Neeson, but The Grey, starring him made just under $20 million its opening weekend, and Taken only scored $24 million, so this huge $50 million haul had to come from somewhere). If there had not been attacks on the American Consulate and international protests against America in the last month, I doubt Taken 2 would have done much better than The Grey; that's not to undermine its artistic genius, however, because--as I pointed out above--it wisely contains many prophetic elements revealing insight into current global tensions that have erupted and do not appear to be solved, or even, solvable. It reveals how deeply troubling the attacks have been to Americans and that our leaders have to do something to assure us that it won't happen again, we are safe and justice will be served and seeking justice is not the same as seeking revenge.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner
No one expected this huge haul for a sequel, and while some critics have placed the success at Liam Neeson's door, the sequel to Taken has raked in twice what the original did and has set an opening record for an action film during the September-October cinema season; we have to ask why? Given the film has received only a 19% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and audiences have graded the film at an average of a B+ (I would give it a B), then what was driving people to see this sequel? Would the film done as well if there had not been the Libyan attacks on the US Consulate and worldwide Islamic protests against America? We can only speculate, but given the inconsistencies between the film's critical reception and how much money it's pulled in, world events are certainly re-coloring the message of the film in a context (probably) never intended.
Which brings us to a genuine problem.
I actually didn't intend for Taken 2 to start the breathing break from our capitalist and socialist break I promised but it fits in nicely with The Cold Light Of Day. I didn't see the original Taken from 2007, but that was a totally different world then compared to today (here is a synopsis of the plot if you haven't seen it). It's important to note that Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) and his wife Lenore (Famke Janssen) are separated and their daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) is allowed to go to Paris where she is kidnapped and sold into sex slavery before she's saved by her father. Mills kills the man who sold her, and it is the father of that man, Murad, who comes to take his revenge on Mills in Taken 2. |
Ben Affleck's Argo opens this week, centered upon similar events, the 1979 Iran hostage crisis during the administration of Democrat President Jimmy Carter. The film, based on the actual caper of the CIA, involved disguising the six escaped Americans as a Canadian film crew to smuggle them out of Iran. I expect great things of Mr. Affleck artistically, as he has fully dedicated himself to advancing the craftsmanship of films on every level, and I have full confidence of the quality of the film; however, knowing Mr. Affleck's liberalism, I expect an interpretation of the film to be along the lines of Hollywood following President Obama's "lead from behind policy," and for Affleck--not to be showing the situation of radical Islamic anti-American hatred and possible solutions--rather, that America should pull out of the Middle East altogether because we are the bad guys and no amount of good intentions on our part can do anything to help the world, rather like The Hurt Locker, which is an anti-war film on one level only (when liberals start talking, they drop all kinds of important values to the wayside, they just can't help it, and end up contradicting themselves terribly). On the other hand, the newest James Bond film Skyfall, opening November 9, also contains an embedded reference to Istanbul (which is where Taken 2 primarily takes place) in that is where M has Bond assassinated. That will be interesting. |
I will be discussing this "generation gap" again in Expendables 2: whereas Expendables 2 sees the younger generation as not having the heart to continue America as a superpower, Taken 2 demonstrates Kim can do it, she just needs the "drive" characteristic of previous generations. She has failed her driving test twice, and Mills is trying to help her so she can pass; when they drive together in the start, he warns her about going too fast and being careful not to hit other cars; when they are trying to escape with their lives in Istanbul, he has to tell her "Faster! Go through it!" and wreck the car or anything necessary to save their lives. There is a difference, in other words, when she let's her emotions "drive her" (when she's upset that dad found her with her boyfriend) and the "drive" she needs to save herself (the future of America), her father (the founding father) and her mother (the motherland), and the film employed this technique quite well.
In conclusion, we have to ask if elements of the film--even just the basic premise--was a primary draw for American audiences given recent world events because it had such an unexpected big opening weekend; I think it did (nothing against Liam Neeson, but The Grey, starring him made just under $20 million its opening weekend, and Taken only scored $24 million, so this huge $50 million haul had to come from somewhere). If there had not been attacks on the American Consulate and international protests against America in the last month, I doubt Taken 2 would have done much better than The Grey; that's not to undermine its artistic genius, however, because--as I pointed out above--it wisely contains many prophetic elements revealing insight into current global tensions that have erupted and do not appear to be solved, or even, solvable. It reveals how deeply troubling the attacks have been to Americans and that our leaders have to do something to assure us that it won't happen again, we are safe and justice will be served and seeking justice is not the same as seeking revenge.
Eat Your Art Out,
The Fine Art Diner
0 comments:
Post a Comment